|

Pop!_OS vs Ubuntu: Which One is Better?

Well, you might find it easy to pick one from the list of best Linux distributions. However, it is often confusing to compare two similar Linux distros, just like Pop!_OS vs Ubuntu.

Interestingly, Pop!_OS is based on Ubuntu. So, what is the difference between Pop!_OS and Ubuntu? Why should you choose one over other?

In this article, I’m going to compare Pop!_OS and Ubuntu (both of which happen to be my favorites).

Note: You might find some of the points opinionated, this article is just a reference for the comparison. With constant developments and updates to Linux distros, a lot can change over time.

Comparing Ubuntu and Pop!_OS

Pop Os Vs Ubuntu
Pop!_OS Vs Ubuntu

Spotting the similarity helps you distinguish other differences. So, let me start noting down some of the obvious similarities.

Like I mentioned, Pop!_OS is a Linux distribution on top of Ubuntu. So, you get all the benefits of using Ubuntu (technically the same thing at its core) when you use Pop!_OS.

They both ship with the GNOME desktop environment by default and hence they feature a similar user interface (UI).

Without going into all the under-the-hood differences, I will be highlighting some important ones here.

User Experience & Theming

Pop Os Ui
Pop!_OS

A lot of users think that Pop!_OS is just Ubuntu with a different skin.

From my experience, I’ll mention that it is not entirely true.

Yes, they both rock GNOME desktop environment – however, Pop!_OS just feels more polished.

In addition to the look and feel, Ubuntu customizes the GNOME experience by adding a dock and a few more tricks. You might find it better if you like a customized GNOME experience.

But, if you prefer a pure GNOME experience, Pop!_OS gives you that by default.

I cannot convince you enough until you try it out for yourself. But, the overall color scheme, icons, and the theme that goes on in Pop!_OS is arguably more pleasing as a superior user experience.

It can be a subjective thing – but it is what I observed. You can also check out the video tour for Ubuntu 19.10 to check it out for yourself:

Ease of Installing Third-Party Apps

Pop Os Ppa
Pop Os PPA

Ubuntu puts a lot of emphasis on Snap packages. This greatly increases the number of application it offers.

But there are some issues with Snap packages. They take too much of disk space and they take a lot of time to start.

This is why I prefer using the APT version of any application.

Why am I telling you this?

Because Pop!_OS has its own official PPA which is enabled by default. You’ll find some useful applications like Android Studio, TensorFlow in here. You can use apt-get install and get these tools. Do note that they might not be packages well. Android Studio PPA downloads the entire tarball and then extracts it on the system.

Of course, you can use the same PPA on a regular Ubuntu as well and take advantage of it.

Pre-installed Applications

Install Ubuntu Linux On Intel Nuc 14 Tutorial
Ubuntu installation slideshow

It may not be the biggest deal-breaker for some but having a lot of pre-installed apps could affect the experience and performance. Even if it does not affect the performance – some users just prefer fewer pre-installed apps.

Pop!_OS comes bundled with fewer default apps (potentially less bloatware, if I may call it that) when compared to Ubuntu.

Yet again, this is something subjective because if you want no bloatware, Ubuntu has the Ubuntu Minimal options that comes with only the bare essentials so that you can choose which application to install.

Snap Package Support

Snapcraft

For users comfortable with the snap packages, Ubuntu’s software center is a slightly better solution to Pop!_OS shop because you can have snap packages listed right in your software center.

You cannot filter the snap packages in the software center but it will be easier to install a snap package when you notice one (look at the details for the source of the app as ‘Snap store‘ / ‘Snapcraft‘) in the Software Center.

Pop!_OS does support snap packages as well – if you’re confused. But, you won’t find them through the Pop!_OS shop, that’s the only difference here.

If you are not sure what a snap package is and what it does, you can check out our article on installing snap apps on Linux.

Separate NVIDIA/AMD ISO File

Iso Amd Nvidia Pop Os
ISOs

Technically, it isn’t a part of the comparison internally but it is a factor that some users care for.

So, it is worth highlighting that Pop!_OS provides separate ISOs. One for the systems with NVIDIA graphics card and another for systems with/without AMD graphics.

With Ubuntu 19.10, you get NVIDIA drivers on the Ubuntu ISO but there is no such thing for AMD graphics.

Reliability & Issues

Unquestionably, both the distributions are beginner-friendly and quite reliable. You might want to hold on to a Long Term Support (LTS) release if you want better reliability and fewer issues.

When a new version of Ubuntu comes up, Pop!_OS works on it and potentially fixes the issues that users encounter on Ubuntu’s original release before making the new upgrade available.

This gives them a slight edge but that’s nothing substantial because those fixes eventually reach Ubuntu.

Performance

The performance will highly depend on what you have installed and the hardware configuration you install it on.

Unless you have a super old system, both distributions seem to perform very well.

I’m rocking an i5-7400 processor coupled with 16 Gigs of RAM (with a GTX 1050ti Graphics Card) and I find the experience good enough on both the distros.

Of course, you could manually do a few optimization tweaks to fit your requirements – if either of them does not work out for your hardware configuration.

But, if you want to get your hands on a System76 laptop, Pop!_OS will prove to be the Apple of Linux space because Pop!_OS has been tailored for their hardware, unlike Ubuntu.

Hardware Compatibility

This is definitely something to consider when comparing other Linux distributions. However, in this case, there’s really no significant difference.

Pop!_OS has custom tweaks to suit their own range of Linux laptops and desktops. If you have got a System76 machine, Pop!_OS should definitely be your choice.

Wrapping Up

Ubuntu is an evergreen distribution that is not hardware centric. Pop!_OS on the other hand is a distribution tailored for System76 hardware.

I know it’s not easy to choose one among the two popular Linux distro without trying them out. If it’s a possibility, I’ll recommend you to give them both a try while keeping this comparison for reference.

What’s your choice between these two? Did I miss something in the comparison? Let me know in the comments below.

Similar Posts

  • I’m a bit late to the party – but one thing Ubuntu has over pop is support: Ask Ubuntu won’t offer help / support for pop os.

  • I have a new Dell Optiplex desktop computer that came with a AMD RX550 discrete video card for dual display. I usually partition my hard drive so I can have a dual boot between Windows (for work) and Ubuntu (for fun) but Ubuntu 22.04 does not work well with the discrete graphics card and gives me the “blackscreen” error. I tried KuBuntu, and that was a disaster as well! Pop!_OS worked out of the box and I am able to keep the “Ubuntu” base.

  • So an entire paragraph about snap support, and no mention of the fact that Flatpack – the package format that actually matters – is supported by Pop OS out of the box, while in Ubuntu Flatpack support sucks?

  • Pop_OS! doesn’t do anything that one cannot make any other linux distro do… it’s just that Pop_OS! does many of those things out-of-the-box and they actually work (e.g. tiling/snapping of windows, specific built-in Nvidia drivers ISOs, etc..). For newbies looking step away from the world of Microsoft or Apple, I feel Pop_OS! is a good stepping off point.

  • Pop OS is filled with bloat .You cannot remove any preinstalled package without removeing the whole pop-desktop.