|

[Review] Otter Browser Brings Hope To Opera Lovers

Otter Browser

Brief: A quick review of Otter Browser and why it brings joy for the old Opera lovers.

The web browser scene looked quite different in the early 2000s. There were two main browsers. Internet Explorer dominated the space with almost 95% market share.

A small upstart named Mozilla had released a browser named Firefox that started the seemingly impossible job of taking away some of that market share. There was a third browser that was not as wide used, but still had a huge impact on the modern browser: Opera.

First released in April 1995, Opera introduced features that we take for granted today, such as: tabs, speed dial, pop-up blocker, browser sessions, and deleting private data.

Even with all these groundbreaking features, Opera never reached number three in terms of market share. In February of 2013, Opera announced they would drop their own Presto layout engine in favor building a new browser based on Google’s Chromium project.

This decision left many hard-core Opera fans in the cold. Opera had a charm of its own, now it’s Chrome with a slightly different coat of paint and improved features, just like SlimJet or any other browser based on Chrome.

Introducing Otter Browser

Polish developer Emdek started the Otter Browser project “to recreate the best aspects of the classic Opera (12.x) UI using Qt5”. According to the project’s FAQ, Otter will not just be a clone of Opera 12. As Emdek says,

Nope, not all of it is even possible or feasible (like Unite, widgets etc.), some of these concepts started to show their age or could be simply done better (for example more flexible while being also simpler to implement and comprehend by the end user).

According to Emdek, he plans to make Otter a modular browser. For example, you will be able to replace the stock bookmark manager with a completely different one. He also plans to include an email client. (Opera had a built-in email client, but they spun it off to be a separate program when they switched to the Chromium codebase.) The mail client will be a module that users can choose to install if they want to or not.

Emdek also mentioned that he wants Otter to be able to use other backends besides QtWebKit. He hopes to include Blink and possibly Gecko.

otter-browser-screenshot

Not Quite Done

The Otter Browser project still has quite a bit of work to do. To give you an idea of what the developers have planned, here is a to-do list taken from the project’s Github page:

  • passwords manager
  • tabs grouping (stacking and panorama mode)
  • support for tab thumbnails embedded in tab bar
  • feeds reader (as module)
  • helper for mouse gestures
  • fine-tune UI (sizes, margins, and other details)

Future features include support for Chrome extensions, a BitTorrent  module and more.

Installation instructions

You can install Otter Browser on your Ubuntu-based systems by pasting these commands into your terminal.

sudo add-apt-repository ppa:otter-browser/release
sudo apt-get update
sudo apt-get install otter-browser

If you have an Arch-based system, you can find otter-browser in the Arch User Repositories.

For all other Linux systems or Windows, you can download install files from the link below:

Download Otter Browser

Final Thoughts

Otter Browser has way to go before it can match the features of Opera 12 (after all, they’re only on version 0.9.10), but they’ve made a great start. I like the idea of being a modular browser to keep the underlying code fresh. I only have experience with writing code for the web, but I know it can be a pain to replace code without affecting the rest of the project.

I also like the idea of being able to switch layout engines. I can see it as being useful for web developers to test their projects for multiple browsers.

What do you think? Were you a fan of the pre-Chromium Opera? Do you think this is another colossal waste of time? Let us know in the comments below.

Similar Posts

  • I certainly miss the features that Opera brought to the table. I dislike the Chrome look and way of doing things intensely. Apart from a few most browsers now look the same and operate in similar ways. I miss the Old Firefox too.

    • You can still get a browser very similar to the Old Firefox in Pale Moon which is a fork of Old Firefox. It will work with a lot of the add-ons and extensions that Firefox abandoned a few years ago if they are still available from the developer. It is my main browser now. Like you I hate Chrome and really miss the Old Opera. Vivaldi is not really that similar to
      Old Opera. I haven’t tried Otter yet.

  • Otter Browser is a very good web browser – it currently has 3 engines: QtWebKit, QtWebKit-ng and QtWebEngine, and it is much more lightweight than Chrome/Opera/Firefox. Recommended!

  • I find the latest incarnations of Opera missing many of the gizmos which made it my only choice of browser since I started using the Internet. I’m currently using Vivaldi which has many of the features which made Opera such a delight to use although, to be quite honest, it isn’t yet perfect but only a few things I want are missing.

    I may try Otter when it’s a little more developed but Vivaldi is fine for me at present and can handle the tens of thousands of bookmarks I have with ease.

  • Indeed it’s a great project, but QtWebkit is slowly dying, and Qt is switching to QtWebEngine, which is Chrome/Blink based. So I’ve some doubt about the sustainability of Otter browser with webkit, finally they have to switch to Blink.
    My personal experience with Otter browser was not so pleasant, and I hate the gtk3 port of Firefox, crappy gtk stuff that sucks !