Ghostboard pixel

Garuda Linux Draws a Line on Age Verification as Arch Stays Keeps Mum

Garuda has taken an official stance on the age verification question, while Arch Linux is silent.
Warp Terminal

Age verification is sadly here to stay, as the politicians pushing these laws don't seem to care much about what people actually think. Open source projects have been left to deal with the fallout, either by starting compliance work, taking a public stance, or outright blocking users from affected regions.

Garuda Linux is one of the latest projects that has had to address this publicly via an official statement, answering the age verification question directly.

Age verification can't touch this

A statement on age verification & the state of the community discourse Announcements Mar 23 4h post by TNE 2 days ago  TNE  Garuda Team at  6 2d Will Garuda Linux implement age verification? Garuda Linux will not implement any age verification measures, since Garuda Linux’s legal jurisdictions have no laws mandating age verification:   Summary Hey. We have no operations in California.  Last time I checked, California law does not (yet) apply where I live, therefore, Garuda Linux will continue to comply with local regulations in Finland and Germany (where the servers are hosted, and the donation funds are held).  Each one of the contributors is also expected to comply with their local laws (so for me that would be Austrian law).  If California law enforcement has a problem with that, they are free to block Garuda Linux’s Website in California. We have no obligation to do that ourselves.  Companies like System76, which sell hardware in California with their OS pre-installed, are however required to comply with this law.

As it turns out, the Garuda Linux team is not losing sleep over California or Brazil's laws. The project's servers are hosted in Finland and Germany, its donation funds are held in Germany, and each contributor is expected to comply with the laws of their own country.

For TNE, the Garuda team member who put out the statement, that translates into compliance with Austrian law. They have gone further to express their personal take on the situation with the Linux community hounding distribution maintainers over age verification.

The people building these distributions in their spare time are staring down fines that could financially ruin them as individuals or jail time if they defy a court order. Some have already been personally attacked for their contributions, and when those attacks got removed, the community turned around and called it censorship.

What TNE is trying to say here is that the anger is real, but it's aimed at the wrong people. Politicians, local representatives, and the organizations lobbying for these laws are the actual targets worth going after.

To make that last bit simpler, it's like you were wronged by someone breadcrumbing you, and you went up in arms to blame the messaging app provider. You have to see who's the party to blame here.

What's Arch Linux doing?

While Garuda is a downstream Arch-based project, the broader Arch family is worth looking at here because the picture there is much messier.

Arch Linux 32, an independent fork that maintains support for 32-bit x86 systems, has already taken action. The project has blocked access for people in Brazil due to the Digital ECA, which came into effect on March 17, 2026.

Go to archlinux r/archlinux β€’ 2d ago jo53_100  why are the age verification posts being deleted in the arch forums? i can't seem to find any open topic ab systemd or age verification implementation anywhere on the official forums, seems like they are actively deleting the posts...  455 Β· 84 Comments Section khsh01 β€’ 2d ago There seems to be a lot of internal push within all distro communities regarding this issue and speaking against it.   260 u/Jethro_Tell avatar Jethro_Tell β€’ 2d ago My guess it that regardless of what they do it will be litigated. I’d assume legal counsel has told them discussion in the internet can only hurt. They will have to decide what the will do and what they legally must do and having that conversation in public will make it difficult if/when it goes to court  103

And what is Arch Linux doing? Not much, at least publicly. Many on Reddit and elsewhere have noticed that posts asking about age verification on the official Arch Linux forums are being deleted. The general sentiment in the thread (linked above) points to the fear of legal action as the likely reason behind the removals.

The situation has not been much clearer on the Arch Forums. Someone recently posted asking for Arch's official stance on the new age verification laws, as their previous post on the same topic had already been deleted.

IndexΒ» Arch DiscussionΒ» Official position on these new age verification laws. Pages:1 #1Today 01:20:49 Hairyplotter Member Registered: 2017-03-25 Posts: 7 Since my prior post was deleted (probably because it was in the wrong forum), I am going to ask again.  What is the official Arch position on these new laws being passed that require every OS to implement age verification?  Personally, I am 100% against this because once a govt. imposed train is in motion, it never stops. Eventually, our computers will want information like names of all users, address, ISP name ect..  Offline  #2Today 01:29:38 V1del Forum Moderator  Registered: 2012-10-16 Posts: 25,085 It was well detailed why it was deleted, there's no stance (neither for nor against at the current point in time): https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php … 0#p2292040  Previous threads have shown that  preemptive speculation will spiral out of control and not lead to fruitful discourse, as you will notice there have been lots of threads on this already, official stances will be announced when they've been made. (and most of the actual decision makers do not frequent this board -- this will not be the place were any "official" announcement is made)  Last edited by V1del (Today 01:33:46)

Forum moderator V1del responded by saying the following:

It was well detailed why it was deleted, there's no stance (neither for nor against at the current point in time): https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php … 0#p2292040

Previous threads have shown that preemptive speculation will spiral out of control and not lead to fruitful discourse, as you will notice there have been lots of threads on this already, official stances will be announced when they've been made. (and most of the actual decision makers do not frequent this board – this will not be the place were any "official" announcement is made)

So there you have it. Arch Linux has no official stance, is actively shutting down community discussions about it, and by a moderator's own admission, the people who would actually make that call are not regulars of the forums.

At this point, age verification laws have done a better job of creating chaos in open source communities than actually protecting any children.

Projects are blocking entire countries, developers are being attacked by their own community, and one of the most influential Linux distributions out there is deleting the conversation entirely.

Quite the outcome for legislation that was supposedly about safety. πŸ˜‘

About the author
Sourav Rudra

Sourav Rudra

A nerd with a passion for open source software, custom PC builds, motorsports, and exploring the endless possibilities of this world.

Become a Better Linux User

With the FOSS Weekly Newsletter, you learn useful Linux tips, discover applications, explore new distros and stay updated with the latest from Linux world

itsfoss happy penguin

Great! You’ve successfully signed up.

Welcome back! You've successfully signed in.

You've successfully subscribed to It's FOSS.

Success! Check your email for magic link to sign-in.

Success! Your billing info has been updated.

Your billing was not updated.